Тhe Prosecutor
Unit 5
THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE
- What is the function of a prosecutor?
- Name some words or phrases related to the subject to be discussed.
- Read and translate the text.
Text 1
Supervision on observing the laws is carried out by the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation. It forms a single, centralized, hierarchical system, public (the lower) prosecutors obeying the higher ones and the Prosecutor General of Russia. As mentioned before, the Prosecutor General of Russia is appointed and dismissed by the Federation Council upon a proposal of the President.
The Prosecutor's Office is the state body that is established to exercise supervisory power over the strict observance and application of law by all ministries, organizations, institutions, officials and citizens of the state.
The prosecutor has the right, and it is his duty, to appeal against all decisions and actions of state bodies and officials which he considers to be unlawful. Every citizen has the right to complain to the prosecutor concerning any violation of the law. When a breach of law contains elements of a crime, it is the duty of the prosecutor to bring the guilty person to trial.
The prosecutor supervises the investigation of cases conducted by the militia, and other state security bodies. The Prosecutor's Office institutes criminal cases and investigates criminal cases, ascertains the circumstances under which crimes were committed, collects evidence against the criminals and their accomplices and sees to it that other investigating bodies act within the law.
During the hearing of cases the prosecutor conducts the prosecution before the court in the name of the state. It is his duty to prove the charges against the accused and to propose the penalty to be imposed on the guilty person. If he is of the opinion that the accused is not guilty, it is his duty to withdraw the charge.
The prosecutor has the right to lodge protests against the sentences and decisions of the courts which he finds illegal.
It may be said that the Prosecutor's Office, like all Russian courts, protects legality, law and order.
- Scan the text to answer the 9 "Who "- questions.
1) Who has the right to appeal against all decisions and actions of the state bodies?
2) Who has the right to complain to the prosecutor
concerning any violation of the
law?
3) Whose duty is it to bring the guilty person to trial?
4) Who supervises the investigation of cases conducted by the militia?
5) Who conducts the prosecution before the court in the name of the state?
6) Who proves the charges against the accused?
7) Who proposes the penalty to be imposed on a guilty person?
8) Who has the duty to withdraw the charge?
9) Who has the right to lodge protests against the sentences and decisions of the courts which he finds illegal?
- Finish the sentences using the facts from the text.
The General Prosecutor of Russia is appointed
by...
The General Prosecutor of Russia is dismissed by ...
The Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation forms...
The Prosecutor's Office is a state body that exercises...
The prosecutor has the right...
The prosecutor supervises...
The prosecutor's duty is...
The Prosecutor's Office institutes...
The Prosecutor's Office investigates... and
sees to it that...
- Read and translate the newspaper clipping. Pay attention to the underlined words.
Essential words and phrases:
an accomplice to bring somebody to trial a circumstance Evidence Execution to impose a penalty to lodge a protest prosecution a prosecutor Prosecutor's office to prove a charge to withdraw a charge |
- соучастник - предать кого-то суду - обстоятельство - доказательства - исполнение - наложить наказание - подавать жалобу, протест - судебное преследование - прокурор - прокуратура - поддерживать обвинение - снять обвинение |
Unit 6
JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS
1. Read and translate the text.
Text 1
In all legal systems there are institutions for creating, modifying, abolishing and applying the law. Usually these take, the form of hierarchy of courts. The role of each cont and its capacity to make decisions is strictly defined in relation to other courts. There are two main reasons for variety of courts. One is that a particular court can specialize in particular kinds of legal actions. The other is so that a person who feels his case was not fairly treated in a lower court can appeal to a higher court for reassessment. The decisions of a higher court are binding upon lower courts.
The court is a state body that administers justice on behalf of the state.
There are courts of first instance (original jurisdiction) and second instance (appellate jurisdiction). A court in which a case is first heard is called the court of first instance. A court of original jurisdiction is one which first examines a case in substance and brings in a sentence or decision. Any court, from, the district court to the Supreme Court of the state may sit as a court of first instance. In almost all cases it is possible to appeal, to higher court for reconsideration of the decision of the original court. A court of second instance is one which examines appeals and protests against sentences and decisions of courts of first instance.
The Constitutional Court ensures that the laws and other normative acts passed or being considered by the supreme and local legislative branches are constitutional.
The Supreme Court is the highest judicial body for civil, criminal, business and other cases. It has the power of supervision over the activities of all the judicial bodies of the state. The Supreme Court gives the court interpretation on the issues of court practice. It tries the most important criminal and civil cases and likewise hears appeals against the judgements and sentences of other courts, as well as appeals against the judgements and sentences of the military courts of the state.
The basic judicial body is the district court. District courts try both criminal and civil cases. It is also the duty of the district courts to protect the electorial rights of citizens. The higher courts of constituent entities of the Russian Federation hear and determine cases of major importance. They are courts of appellate jurisdiction.
The Supreme Arbitration Court is the highest judicial body for settling economic disputes and other cases examined by courts of arbitration; it exercises judicial supervision over their activities in the procedural forms envisaged by federal law and provides interpretation on issues of court proceedings.
In all courts cases are tried in public. The participants in the trial (the prosecutor, the lawyers, the plaintiff, the judge, the defendant and the others) speak in the open court. The accused is guaranteed the right to defend. The press has the right to be present.
During the hearing of a case any citizen may enter the courtroom and be present during the trial from the beginning to the end. The hearing of cases in closed session is allowed only in exceptional cases. Closed sessions are only allowed if it is in the interests of both sides or for the necessity to keep state secrets. Trial without participation of both sides is not allowed. The judges are independent and they must obey the law.
2. Are these statements true or false?
1) There are courts of first instance and second instance.
2) A court of first instance
examines appeals and protests against sentences and
decisions of other courts.
3) Any court, from the
district court to the Supreme Court of the state, may sit as a
court of first instance.
4) Higher courts hear and determine cases of major importance.
5) The basic judicial body is the Supreme Court
3. Scan the text to find the answers to the “What-questions”.
- What is the role of each court?
- What is the function of a court of first instance?
- What is the basic judicial body of state?
- What is the function of a court of second instance?
- What cases does a district court consider?
- What are the functions of the Supreme Court?
- What is the status of judges?
- What are the participants of the trial?
4. Match these words and phrases with their Russian equivalents.
|
|
Essential words and phrases:
accused defence a defendant to examine a case in substance proceeding prosecutor reassessment |
- обвиняемый - защита - ответчик - рассматривать дело по существу - зд. Судопроизводство - обвинитель - переоценка, пересмотр
|
SUPPLEMENT II
THE LAW AND THE FAMILY
1. Read the texts about the family law.
Here we will look at how the law sees the family as a special institution; how some legal systems treat married couples and their children differently from the unmarried; the process of divorce; custody of and responsibility for children; and protection from violence in the home.
Beyond the mere function of providing a new generation of children, the family is often promoted for its moral contribution to society. Despite a growing labour shortage, the Japanese government has passed very little legislation challenging the assumption that mothers should stay at home rather than go out to work. In Ireland, which is strongly influenced by the doctrines of the Catholic Church, divorce remains illegal.
In some societies the family is thought to be so important that there is very little legal intervention in family life. In many Islamic countries, for example, fathers, brothers and sons are allowed considerable authority over the females in their family. As late as the 1970s, the male head of the household in Switzerland was deemed to represent the interests of everyone within that household, and, consequently, none of the women could vote in national elections. But in many parts of the world, the law now promotes the rights of individuals within the family unit, and regulates family relations through legislation. Raised from the taxes of the working population as a whole, Child Benefit is paid directly to the mother, and retirement pensions are paid to grandparents, so that they are less dependent upon financial support from a family member. In Sweden, parents can be prosecuted for physical punishing their children and children have a limited capacity to divorce their parents. In Britain, as in many countries, there are special family courts with very strong powers to control and transfer private property in the interests of children. Much of the work of other courts is also directly relevant to family life.
Marriage law
The law in most countries places more emphasis upon marriages legally registered than social arrangements whereby people live together. In Japan, some couples prefer not to register their marriage because the law requires one of them to give up his or her name in favour of the other. The birth and residence documentation of children born to such marriages is different from that of other children and sometimes leads to discrimination. In Britain, children born outside legitimate marriages have fewer rights to financial support from estranged fathers than legitimate children. In addition, if they are born outside the UK, they are less likely than legitimate children to be granted British citizenship. Their fathers have no automatic right to have contact with them. Some welfare payments are calculated on a different basis according to whether recipients are married or not, and more procedures are available to a married woman than an unmarried one in seeking protection from domestic violence. However, in most industrialised countries, the legal differences between the married and the unmarried are decreasing. It is not surprising this should be the case in a nation like the United Sates, for example, here 25 percent of babies are now born to unmarried parents.
In English law, some marriages may be readily dissolved, or nullified - for example: if the couple never consummated the marriage, are blood relations, are under the legal age of sixteen, are both women or, despite a surgical sex change, are both men. In other cases, a couple may seek a divorce. The procedure may be lengthy, especially if one spouse does not want to get divorced, or if there are children. In no case will English law allow divorce proceedings to start within a year of the marriage, since it is thought this is too soon for the marriage to have tested itself. It is also feared that people would get married without serious thought if it were quick and easy to get a divorce.
Divorce law
Divorce proceedings in England take place in certain County Courts known as divorce County Courts. Some matters are also dealt within the Family Division of the High Court. It is necessary for one of the parties to convince the court that the marriage has broken down irretrievably -without any chance of reconciliation. To do this the person seeking, or petitioning for divorce, must prove one of five things: that the other party, or respondent, committed adultery (had sex with someone else); that the respondent's behaviour has been unreasonable; that the respondent deserted the petitioner at least two years previously; that the couple has lived apart for two years and both agree to a divorce; or that they have lived apart for five years. Even if the court is satisfied that there is enough evidence of one of the above, a divorce will not be issued until satisfactory arrangements have been made for any children of the marriage, including determining who is to have custody of the children, the rights of the children to maintain contact with the other parent, and financial arrangement for the children's welfare.
The High Court or divorce county court has wide powers to order both an ex-husband and an ex-wife to make financial provisions for the other and for their children. This may include periodic payments, a lump sum of cash, transfer of property into the other spouse's name, or sale of property so that the money can be divided. In general, these orders are supposed to support the children and other spouse (usually the one taking care of the children; often the mother) until they become financially independent.
When a couple separates, whether married or unmarried, the welfare of any children and the division of any property are the most important, and often the most difficult problems, to resolve. People who once lived together happily may argue bitterly once the trust between them has dissolved. Although it is possible, and certainly much cheaper, to arrange most of the terms of a divorce privately without lawyers, many couples find that it is impossible for them to reach such an agreement.
In the case of property, the courts have to find a balance between two principles. One is that any division should fairly reflect how much each party contributed to the property they held together. In the past, some women suffered when they separated from their husband because the house they lived in was bought with his money and registered in his name. Nowadays, courts look beyond legal ownership and cash contributions. Work done in the home, time spent caring for the family, even emotional support, are all considered as giving some rights to property. In the United States, there have been cases of the lovers of famous entertainers claiming a proportion of the income earned by their partner during the time they lived together, and sometimes millions of dollars have been at issue.
The other principle which courts must consider is the needs of the parties. It is no longer assumed that a woman who was financially dependent on her husband when they were married will remain so after they are divorced, but the length of the marriage and the age and skills of the woman will be considered in deciding how soon - if at all - she is likely to become independent. There are a few cases of a court refusing to grant a divorce at all because the couple in question was elderly and would never recover from the financial shock.
International law
International law is not new. Nations have always made political and economic treaties with each other. In Medieval Europe, the Canon Law of the Catholic Church had an important role. Law Merchant regulated trade across political frontiers. In the fifteenth century, the Church mediated rivalry between Spain and Portugal by dividing the world into their respective areas of interest. The 1648 Treaty of Westphalia, which called for equal treatment everywhere of Protestants and Catholics, can be seen as an early international human rights law. Nevertheless, most international laws have been created in the twentieth century. The League of Nations was set up after World War I to regulate disputes between nations. However, it failed to stop the tension that led to World War II, partly because some powerful countries did not join (U. S.) and others left when they disagreed with its decisions (Germany, Japan). But it led to important international legislation like the Geneva Convention on the treatment of prisoners of war and the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees.
There are some important differences between international laws and those created inside individual states. Domestic laws are passed by legislative bodies, most of which have some popular political support. International laws, on the other hand, are created by agreements among governments.
As a result, it is not as clear whether they have the support of individual citizens. Enforcement of international law is also different. Many international agreements are not binding - for example UN General Resolutions. Even when nations agreed to be bound, as in the case of signatories of the 1966 International Convention on Civil and Political Rights, it is unclear how obligations are to be enforced.
Unit 4
ENFORCING THE LAW
1. Answer the following questions.
- What state bodies are responsible for preventing any violations of law?
- Do common people bear responsibility for preventing any offences?
- Should we regard any person' s attempt to help the law enforcement bodies to find
a criminal as an act of courage?
2. Read and translate the text.
Text 1
- The state has many ways
of making sure that citizens obey the law. It makes
the public aware of what the law is and tries to encourage social support for law and
order. It uses militia to investigate crimes and catch criminals. It authorizes courts to
complete the investigation of criminal and civil offences and to pass sentences to
punish the guilty and deter others. And it makes efforts to re-educate and reform
people who have broken the law. - Ignorance of the law is
almost never a defence for breaking it. Governments
usually expect citizens to be aware of the laws which affect their lives. Sometimes
this seems very harsh, for example, when the law is very technical. However, there
are many laws, such as those prohibiting theft, assault and dangerous driving, which
simply reflect social and moral attitudes to everyday behavior. In such cases a person
knows he is breaking the law, even if he doesn't know exactly which law it is.
- So, the state combats
crime through the courts, the Prosecutor's Office,
investigating authorities, state security bodies; militia and other law-enforcement
agencies. They have to perform a series of acts to establish the fact of the crime,
discover the offender and determine the penalty to be imposed in vertue of law. - After receiving
information that a crime
has been committed, the
investigator, for instance, commences the preliminary investigation: he inspects the
scene of the crime, summons and questions witnesses, detains suspects, etc. During
the investigation of a criminal case, he has the right to demand that citizens should
take part in examinations and searches, and testify on the facts known to them; and
that persons in office make available certificates, documents etc. The militia, the
investigator, the prosecutor and the court may make such demands only within the
power vested in them by law. - The main objectives of
the militia have always been to protect, state and
personal property, to maintain public law and order, to safeguard the rights and
interests of citizens. To fulfil these functions properly the Internal Affairs bodies
compose several departments. The Criminal Detection Department is to detect the
criminal, that is to locate and arrest him (her). The Criminal Investigation
Department collects evidence to prove the guilt or innocence of a suspect. The
Economic Crimes Department reveals the economic offences. The mission of the
State Inspection of Road Traffic Security is to regulate safety in the roads. The
Juvenile Inspection is responsible for prevention of juvenile delinquency.
3. Answer the following questions.
1) Through what bodies does the state combat crime?
2) What acts must these bodies perform?
3) What does the investigator do after receiving information that a crime has been committed?
4) What rights do the investigating bodies have during the investigation of a criminal case?
5) What functions does the militia have to perform in the law-enforcement process?
6) Is ignorance of the law a defence for breaking it? Give reasons for it?
7) What are the ways of making sure that citizens obey the law?
4. Finish the sentences using the words in brackets.
1) The Supreme Court examines more serious _______ (crimes, article, case, clause, murder).
2) After receiving the information that a crime has been committed, the investigator commences the preliminary ________.
(questioning, seizure, investigation, punishment, sentence).
3) The militia safeguards _______.
(a criminal, an offender, the interests of citizens, an assessor).
4) the challenge of the militia has always been to protect __________, to maintain ______.
(state and personal property, criminals, offenders, public law and order).
5. Read and translate the newspaper clipping. Pay attention to the underlined words.
By Simon Saradzyan
Moscow Tribune.
The Interior Minister hopes to put an end to the eternal rivalry of Russian law-enforcement agencies, but these forces are somewhat sceptical to his good will.
"It is expedient to vest coordination of the operational activities of law -enforcement agencies in the sphere of fighting organized crime to me by a presidential decree", the Interior Minister wrote in a classified letter to the Russian President.
The letter, leaked to the Russian Press earlier this week, is accompanied by a draft presidential decree. If signed by the President, it would put mafia -fighters from as many as seven agencies under the Interior Minister's thumb.
These agencies are: The Federal Security Service (FSB), the State Customs Committee (GTK), the Federal Border Guard Service (FPS), the Federal Guard service (FSO), the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), the Federal Drug Control Service (FSNK) and the Interior Ministry (MVD).
Essential words and phrases:
to combat crime - бороться с преступностью to commence - начинать to commit - совершить преступление criminal proceedings criminal procedure to detain a suspect to discover etc. to impose to maintain law and order to make available the militia an offender in vertue of law to perform acts a person in office preliminary investigation the Prosecutor’s Office to receive search state security bodies to summon to testify trial to vest power in somebody a witness
|
- бороться с преступностью - начинать - совершить преступление - судопроизводство
- задержать подозреваемого - находить - и т.д. - налагать наказание - поддерживать правопорядок - предоставлять в распоряжение - милиция - правонарушитель - в силу закона - проводить действия - должностное лицо - предварительное следствие - прокуратура - получать - обыск, осмотр места преступления - органы госбезопасности - вызывать - давать показания - судебный процесс - облекать полномочиями кого-либо - свидетель |
- Табак, алкоголь и здоровье
- Табакокурение
- Табакокурение
- Табакокурение
- Табакокурение
- Табакокурение
- Табакокурение
- Сюртук
- С.Я. Маршак биография
- Тeoрeтичeскиe и мeтoдичeскиe oснoвы фoрмирoвaния кoрпoрaтивнoй культуры в oргaнизaции
- Тəрбие əдістері
- Тəрбие құрал-жабдықтары мен формалары
- Тəрбие принциптері
- Тhe history of memorial day
